The box was an interesting thematic element because it not only worked as a persuasive and poetic artifact, but also as a model for your concept. So even though you didn't end up putting cubes on laniards, you certainly gave the participants an interesting novelty item they will more likely rather keep than discard. Kind of like a poster but more personal.
I do think it would be a good thing to let some of those rich elements from the box seep into the disk packaging that is received after round 1.
The dicut image as a part of your "round type" identity is a nice solution to long road of possibilities you were working on.
Overall it seems to have gone through a long transformative process from your initial group experiments.
The forced interaction- a nice idea, but there is bound to be a way to give us a general idea of how your hypothetical situation could work out (without artist and designer fights). If you think of the attendants as animals fitting into there occupational niche, the artists and designers of your interaction need each other in order to complete there objective. You could probably regulate ratio of designers to artists too.
Instead of using the words "forced interaction" you could maybe make it sound like a consensual agreement to work together.
1 comment:
The box was an interesting thematic element because it not only worked as a persuasive and poetic artifact, but also as a model for your concept. So even though you didn't end up putting cubes on laniards, you certainly gave the participants an interesting novelty item they will more likely rather keep than discard. Kind of like a poster but more personal.
I do think it would be a good thing to let some of those rich elements from the box seep into the disk packaging that is received after round 1.
The dicut image as a part of your "round type" identity is a nice solution to long road of possibilities you were working on.
Overall it seems to have gone through a long transformative process from your initial group experiments.
The forced interaction- a nice idea, but there is bound to be a way to give us a general idea of how your hypothetical situation could work out (without artist and designer fights). If you think of the attendants as animals fitting into there occupational niche, the artists and designers of your interaction need each other in order to complete there objective. You could probably regulate ratio of designers to artists too.
Instead of using the words "forced interaction" you could maybe make it sound like a consensual agreement to work together.
I'll write more if more comes to mind.
Post a Comment